Anamnesis as a Prognostic Factor in Cochlear Implantation in Adults.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to analyze possible preoperative factors taken from the medical history that may assist the otolaryngologist in counseling an adult patient before cochlear implantation (CI). OBJECTIVE: Analysis of preoperative factors taken during the initial patient presentation for a possible prognostic role in the auditory rehabilitation outcome. METHODS: A cohort of 232 (272 CI implantations) postlingually deafened adults was evaluated in this study. Hearing results at 1, 2, and up to 3 years postoperatively were compared with various preoperative factors: living status, cause of deafness, gender, side of implantation, residual hearing, and duration of deafness. Postoperative hearing performance was measured based on the German Freiburg monosyllabic word test and the Oldenburg sentence test. RESULTS: Duration of deafness showed a negative correlation to word recognition and a positive correlation to increased speech reception threshold in sentence testing. A significant decline in hearing outcome was shown starting around the second decade of deafness. Residual hearing as defined in our cohort and side of implantation showed limited benefit in speech understanding. Living status, gender, and cause of deafness did not show any prognostic value. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective review it could be shown that simple case history information can only provide limited prognostic insight before CI. The duration of deafness is the most reliable anamnestic factor present on initial patient evaluation.

Prognostic factors in cochlear implantation in adults: Determining central process integrity.

The purpose of this study is to examine various preoperative factors that can play a role in the auditory rehabilitation outcome of cochlear implant (CI) recipients. In order to determine the level of integrity of central processing preoperatively, special attention was given to residual hearing, duration of deafness, and cochlear nerve diameter as prognostic factors. A cohort of 232 (272 CI implantations) postlingually deafened adults was evaluated in this study. Hearing results at 1, 2 and up to 3 years postoperatively were compared with various preoperative factors: promontory stimulation testing, residual hearing, duration of deafness, and magnetic resonance imaging of the cochlear nerve. Postoperative hearing performance was measured based on the German Freiburg monosyllabic word test and the Oldenburg sentence test. Postoperative hearing performance showed a significant improvement in each consecutive year after implantation. Duration of deafness showed a negative correlation to word recognition and a positive correlation to increased signal-to-noise-ratio in sentence testing. A significant decline in hearing outcome was shown starting around the second decade of deafness corresponding to 66% of life spent in deafness. MR imaging of cochlear nerve diameter shows a positive correlation of larger nerve diameter to better speech understanding. Promontory stimulation testing did not show any prognostic value. In this retrospective review it could be shown that there is an intricate interaction in the preoperative variables: duration of deafness - as well as the ratio of life spent in deafness; residual hearing; and cochlear nerve diameter.